3 Types of Argument
There are two ways to implement something. Neither option is perfect -- both have their own compromises, which are known and measurable. Argument centres on which compromises are most acceptable.
Example: should the bike-shed be made from wood or brick?
There are two ways to implement something. Both are functionally correct, but have unquantifiable differences. Argument centres on intuition and opinion.
Example: should we paint the bike-shed topaz or cyan?
There are two conflicting points of view. Both are utterly wrong. Argument has no centroid and no limiting factors.
Example: should the bike-shed be built to honour the green walrus or the almighty unicorn?[notebook image above is 'a thorough mathematical analysis of two competing models for optimising energy dissipation through behavioural approaches to leaving the toilet seat up.'] Next → ← Previous
I'm currently writing a book about how to build your first product. If you want to build your first product, please sign up to be notified when the book is available.