Moveable Modal and a different kind of 'Modal' form
secretGeek .:dot Nuts about dot Net:.
home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: secretGeek RSS

Moveable Modal and a different kind of 'Modal' form

When one form in an application is modal: you can't *move* the underlying forms around.

This is a shame -- because often you need to see something in an underlying form, to help you decide what to enter into the current form.

It's okay that you can't interact with the client area of the underlying forms... but it would be good if you could move the underlying forms around.

It's a tricky problem though: it would be hard to let you move one of those non-modal forms around without giving them focus...

The top-most modal form would need to be 'always on top' for the application, so that while moving underlying forms around, you can't "lose" the form you are supposed to be working on. Anyway. That is my feature request for today.

And here's another idea that i had about modal forms...

There is such a thing as 'modal for the application' -- meaning that 'of all the forms in this application, the modal one will have focus'.

And there is the rather brutal concept of 'modal for the system' meaning that nothing else can be done on that machine until this form is taken care of.

What about: "Modal for the organisation" meaning that every machine in a company is locked until that one form has been taken care of. The form might appear on everyone's machine, or just on one person's machine. I haven't figured out the specifics. I is just ideas rat.

And of course there should be "Modal for the internet" meaning that nothing can occur on the entire internet until a particular question has been answered.

And finally, "universal modal" -- meaning that the entire universe is frozen at absolute zero with not a single molecule so much as jiggling, until a particular form has been taken care of.

(Note this shouldn't be the default behaviour for many application)

(Also, this reminds me of a quote from (Leo Tolstoy? Henry Miller?) -- "We have not yet decided the question of the existence of god, and you wish to eat!?")





'SimonH' on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:10:07 GMT, sez:

'And finally, "universal modal" -- meaning that the entire universe is frozen at absolute zero with not a single molecule so much as jiggling, until a particular form has been taken care of.'

Can you imagine the chaos (um, stasis, maybe) caused by one of these in an infinite loop? Think of the children!

This is thinly veiled cyber-terrorism; you should be ashamed.



'Wesley Shephard' on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:52:12 GMT, sez:

Modal dialogs are *so easy* to write, but really don't serve the user. In addition to the problem you cite, there is the "grab the focus and take your touch typing as input" aspect that drives me insane.

I don't know how many dialogs I have "confirmed" (well, maybe confirmed, maybe it was declined... there is no way to know) by accident because of a modal dialog jumping up and deciding it was more important than the sentence I was typing.

In my applications I always try to open new windows *only* in direct response to a click event (or a keyboard event specifically equivalent, such as an ALT-keystroke).

To do the notifications needed, I created a notification area in the status bar which blinks and contains relevant information about any notices. Clicking it brings up the notifications that have queued.

This means that instead of "Do you really want the commitment of saving this data?" messages, I provide a history that allows records to be rolled back to prior states. Instead of "OMG, Ponies" popups when something happens, they go to the notification bar. Just a bit more effort, and modal dialogs can become a thing of the past. Like text mode applications.



'Martin Marconcini' on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:47:48 GMT, sez:

Mac OS X has a different approach, if you Command-Click a form that is behind another, you can move it around, without losing the current focus; this is very handy. I have seen Windows OS application stealing focus more often than OS X counterparts, however under Apple's operating system, *sometimes* that annoying focus steal will happen. Guess no one is perfect tho. ;)

There could be a "Modal for the Modal", where both modal forms fight in some kind of "Arena of the Modal Forms" or a dirty fight. Winner form gets the focus.



'chk' on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:35:27 GMT, sez:

Have you ever thought of moving the modal form around to see the underlying data? ;-)

Often that helps.

Ch,



'lb' on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:19:02 GMT, sez:

>moving the modal form around to see the underlying data

yeh, i should probably clarify that there are situations where the underlying forms obscure each other -- and moving the modal form around isn't good enough.



'Carl' on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:45:20 GMT, sez:

"And finally, "universal modal" -- meaning that the entire universe is frozen at absolute zero with not a single molecule so much as jiggling, until a particular form has been taken care of."

I hate to inform you that this idea is severely flawed...

If not a single molecule is allowed to jiggle, how is the intended recipient of said modal dialog intended to deal with it?

I think that what you probably intended is that every molecule except for those making up this 'intended recipient' and his/her 'Sphere of Influence'.

Unfortunately, as is generally the case in these universal modal dialog situations, this user could possibly have just nipped to the toilet, or even worse, died...

Lol, I have images of sitting on the loo the lights dimming and a large, Trapdoor-esque voice booming out to inform me that I must attend to a universal modal dialog box..

;o)



'lb' on Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:55:33 GMT, sez:

>I think that what you probably intended is
>that every molecule except for those
>making up this 'intended recipient' and
>his/her 'Sphere of Influence'.

yep that's what i meant. I've investigated the physics behind this thoroughly and it turns out that yeh -- what you said. that's it.




name


website (optional)


enter the word:
 

comment (HTML not allowed)


All viewpoints welcome. But the right to delete any post for any reason is reserved. Don't make me do it. Comments may be republished, emailed to your loved ones or printed and used as toilet paper. Who reads this legal bit anyhow?

TimeSnapper is a life analysis system that stores and plays-back your computer use. It makes timesheet recording a breeze, helps you recover lost work and shows you how to sharpen your act.

TimeSnapper won last year's Developer Competition at Larkware.com, and is used by over 10,000 people.

Articles

Alan Kay on 'The Camel has Two Humps' Alan Kay on 'The Camel has Two Humps'
is the music inside the piano? is the music inside the piano?
The Bluffer's Guide To Yegge: Business Requirements R Bullsh*t The Bluffer's Guide To Yegge: Business Requirements R Bullsh*t
Prototype Ready for Launch Prototype Ready for Launch
Idea: a poor man's eye-tracking heatmap for win forms Idea: a poor man's eye-tracking heatmap for win forms
'The Register' seems to have plagiarised Mary Jo Foley 'The Register' seems to have plagiarised Mary Jo Foley
A magic goal for software businesses A magic goal for software businesses
A to Z of Software Methodologies A to Z of Software Methodologies
TimeSnapper in Music! TimeSnapper in Music!
Fixing problems can give you a glimpse of something terrible Fixing problems can give you a glimpse of something terrible
Web Tablet: Toward Less Complexity Web Tablet: Toward Less Complexity
Do they store the code for TFS in TFS? Do they store the code for TFS in TFS?
Sudden TimeSnapper Discount! Sudden TimeSnapper Discount!
How Can Microsoft Beat Google? How Can Microsoft Beat Google?
TimeSnapper 3.1: Attack of the the Red/Green Stripes TimeSnapper 3.1: Attack of the the Red/Green Stripes
21 tools used in our MicroISV 21 tools used in our MicroISV
Lost Treasures of the DOS World: tree! Lost Treasures of the DOS World: tree!
The Virtual Machine Machine and the Virtual Virtual Machine The Virtual Machine Machine and the Virtual Virtual Machine
Should Linq To Sql Go Should Linq To Sql Go "Open Source"?
Redux: New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Redux: New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft
New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Live team New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Live team
Visual Studio UX Taskforce, Office UX Taskforce... etc. Visual Studio UX Taskforce, Office UX Taskforce... etc.
How to be Jeff Atwood How to be Jeff Atwood

Archives .: secretGeek :: Complete Archives :.
25 steps for building a Micro-ISV 25 steps for building a Micro-ISV
3 minute guides -- babysteps in new technologies: powershell, JSON, watir, F# 3 Minute Guide Series
Top 10 SecretGeek articles Top 10 SecretGeek articles

Downloads

TimeSnapper -- Automated Screenshot Journal TimeSnapper.com    
Version 3.1: instant productivity profiles

ShinyPower (help with Powershell) ShinyPower
Now at CodePlex

Next Action NextAction
Managing the top of your mind



[powered by Google] 


World's Simplest Code Generator (html edition) World's Simplest Code Generator
Gradient Maker -- a tool for making background images that blend from one colour to another. Forget photoshop, this is the bomb. Gradient Maker
How to be depressed How to be depressed
You are not inadequate.



Recommended Reading

The Best Software Writing I
The Business Of Software (Eric Sink)

Recommended blogs

Jeff Atwood
Reginald Braithwaite
Joseph Cooney
Phil Haack
Scott Hanselman
Julia Lerman
Joel Pobar
Eric Sink
Joel Spolsky
Des Traynor

Aggregated Links

programming.reddit.com
dzone
dot net kicks

Human Link Machines

interesting finds
a continuous learner's weblog
arjan's world
n links today
new and notable
morning coffee
learning .net
weekly link post
(my del.icio.us account)

LinkedIn profile
 
home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: secretGeek RSS .: © Leon Bambrick 2006 .: privacy

home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: RSS .: © Leon Bambrick 2006 .: privacy