The future of microsoft development
secretGeek .:dot Nuts about dot Net:.
home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: secretGeek RSS

The future of microsoft development

Where is mainline Microsoft development today? Where tomorrow?

Once, mainline Microsoft development was: MFC C++ apps and VB 5 applications. For the windows platform.

Then, for a short while it was Windows Forms applications, in .net, mostly C#, partly VB.net.

For the last several years, ASP.net has had the lion's share of attention from microsoft.

(Compare the data providers in Windows forms versus Web forms... linq support is complete on the web, but patchy on windows)

Where's it headed now? Will it return to the windows platform, with WPF? Or stay web-based with silverlight?

Is WPF "too much too late" for development on the windows platform?

Is asp.net for html now doomed, like MFC or VB 6? Will ajax for asp.net move ahead, or be dropped for silverlight?

Why do we always quit at 90%?

Are microsoft afraid that if they do anything well, it will give them nowhere to go?

Or is the last 10% harder than the first 90% put together?

Did Robert Scoble Die For Nothing?

No, hang on, honestly. Let's try that again. I say: 'Did Robert Scoble Die For Nothing?' and you say, 'But wait. Robert Scoble's still alive,' got it? Okay.

me: Did Robert Scoble Die For Nothing?

you: But wait. Robert Scoble's still alive.

(very good, now i say...)

me: Oh, I hadn't noticed.





'Francois' on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:54:58 GMT, sez:

the future of applications is delivery via the internet.

how small does an operating system need to be? what is an operating system really?

soon every computer will have operating systems that have a few things in common: ability to read and write common image types, document types, media (audio, videos) -- and then the applications will all be delivered (and cacheable) via the internet.

please read this entire thought before you decide i am saying something obvious:

eventually, all computer will run some kind of variant of linux. but by then operating systems won't matter. the apps will be delivered by internet -- no dvds required. how long till a 100 meg application is just pow! and it is on your computer. they will run natively.

silverlight is funny but look back at it in history -- everyone will take this idea so much further -- moonlight -- or more -- a ruby client in the browser -- what java wanted to be, but a different sandboxing model. virtualisation of applications, with multiple threading.

linux needs microsoft to steal ideas from. microsoft needs apple to invent new problems. then microsoft solves those problems, and linux steals them and they are in everyone's hands!

Ha ha! thank you Apple! thank you microsoft! thank you linux! the stupid triumvirate!



'Robert Scoble' on Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:13:24 GMT, sez:

It's all true. Everything you read on the Internet is true.

Or at least, it WILL be true someday! :-)



'John Walker' on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:21:03 GMT, sez:

@Francois,

<rant>
Some of us out here are writing applications for corporations, government, etc. These are applications that cannot and most likely never will be delivered by the Internet. We (my company) write applications for the government sector. .Net apps. Imagine us trying to tell them the next version of their app will be grabbed from the Internet. Ain't gonna happen.

I'm immersed in my RSS feeds, including Scoble's and the rest, but I can't help but feel their content is based on a very small, closed Silicon Valley clique. Sure there's a big market out there for that stuff, but there's probably a much bigger market out there for developers and companies like mine.

Right now, we're facing a problem. We have a big VB6 app that needs to go to .NET. Do we do it in Winforms, WCF, ASP.NET or Silverlight. The tools and controls aren't there yet for WCF, the pain of web apps is too much, so we're going for Winforms. We cannot wait. I wish the Winforms stuff was better. I wish Microsoft really got that last 10% done for us.

</Rant>



'John Lopez' on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:05:57 GMT, sez:

"magine us trying to tell them the next version of their app will be grabbed from the Internet. Ain't gonna happen."

Network delivery does not equal "from the Internet". It means that a server has content and it is sent to you on demand. In many cases, that content will be be secured. It may simply be secured by an account login and SSH, or it may be on a private Intranet.

I also think this "either/or" approach to software development (where the entire application must be delivered in one technology) is a poor one. I suspect that we will see more and more applications delivered via browsers, with traditional pages doing the bulk of the work but invoking augmenting components to offset the limitations. (And of course "traditional pages" will become more powerful over time, gaining abilities once reserved for add-ins).




name


website (optional)


enter the word:
 

comment (HTML not allowed)


All viewpoints welcome. But the right to delete any post for any reason is reserved. Don't make me do it. Comments may be republished, emailed to your loved ones or printed and used as toilet paper. Who reads this legal bit anyhow?

TimeSnapper is a life analysis system that stores and plays-back your computer use. It makes timesheet recording a breeze, helps you recover lost work and shows you how to sharpen your act.

TimeSnapper won last year's Developer Competition at Larkware.com, and is used by over 10,000 people.

Articles

Do they store the code for TFS in TFS? Do they store the code for TFS in TFS?
Sudden TimeSnapper Discount! Sudden TimeSnapper Discount!
How Can Microsoft Beat Google? How Can Microsoft Beat Google?
TimeSnapper 3.1: Attack of the the Red/Green Stripes TimeSnapper 3.1: Attack of the the Red/Green Stripes
21 tools used in our MicroISV 21 tools used in our MicroISV
Lost Treasures of the DOS World: tree! Lost Treasures of the DOS World: tree!
The Virtual Machine Machine and the Virtual Virtual Machine The Virtual Machine Machine and the Virtual Virtual Machine
Should Linq To Sql Go Should Linq To Sql Go "Open Source"?
Redux: New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Redux: New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft
New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Live team New Synchronisation Idea Overlooked By Microsoft Live team
Visual Studio UX Taskforce, Office UX Taskforce... etc. Visual Studio UX Taskforce, Office UX Taskforce... etc.
How to be Jeff Atwood How to be Jeff Atwood

Archives .: secretGeek :: Complete Archives :.
25 steps for building a Micro-ISV 25 steps for building a Micro-ISV
3 minute guides -- babysteps in new technologies: powershell, JSON, watir, F# 3 Minute Guide Series
Top 10 SecretGeek articles Top 10 SecretGeek articles

Downloads

TimeSnapper -- Automated Screenshot Journal TimeSnapper.com    
Version 3.1: instant productivity profiles

ShinyPower (help with Powershell) ShinyPower
Now at CodePlex

Next Action NextAction
Managing the top of your mind



[powered by Google] 


Thai Erawan, Brisbane Restaurant, delicious thai food in paddington Thai Erawan, Brisbane Restaurant
World's Simplest Code Generator (html edition) World's Simplest Code Generator
Gradient Maker -- a tool for making background images that blend from one colour to another. Forget photoshop, this is the bomb. Gradient Maker
How to be depressed How to be depressed
You are not inadequate.



Recommended Reading

The Best Software Writing I
The Business Of Software (Eric Sink)

Recommended blogs

Jeff Atwood
Reginald Braithwaite
Joseph Cooney
Phil Haack
Scott Hanselman
Julia Lerman
Joel Pobar
Eric Sink
Joel Spolsky
Des Traynor

Aggregated Links

programming.reddit.com
dzone
dot net kicks

Human Link Machines

interesting finds
a continuous learner's weblog
arjan's world
n links today
new and notable
morning coffee
learning .net
weekly link post
(my del.icio.us account)

LinkedIn profile
 
home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: secretGeek RSS .: © Leon Bambrick 2006 .: privacy

home .: about .: sign up .: sitemap .: RSS .: © Leon Bambrick 2006 .: privacy