Yeh I know that I "should" reboot once I've received updates. But can you please tell me what has been updated? And give me a few clues as to what will go wrong if I hold off for a few minutes?
Interrupting my work every five minutes is a rude thing to do, so when you do it, please provide details.
(i've complained about this before... and thanks to google i found out where: on mike pope's blog)
[my bad... as Douglas points out in the content... this isn't the password, just a flag]I don't think I've ever seen such a brilliant error message, as one I just found at solucija.com
It not only includes the connection details.... but the PASSWORD TOO!!!
I love the site's slogan:
What's your solution?
uh, my solution involves *not* telling everyone my password.
Not wishing to harp on ajax portals for too long... but here's a comparison of 'google/ig', live.com and the independent (french?) netvibes, in two categories: weather and aggregator.
Sadly, few have stated the argument more elegantly than Pennino:
"People has to start boycotting products from these companies."
While I agree with Pennino, I particularly think that artists should be urged to boycott Sony. This is one of the most thoroughly pre-meditated crimes imaginable, and it has been performed in the name of talented and creative people. If they have any concern for their reputation (which we can be fairly certain they do) then they ought to look elsewhere for ways to distribute their work.
You've got a blog? Here are five ways you can increase* the chance that your feed will show up properly in Live.com
(* update: live.com still reserves the right to fail at any moment)
If possible, keep the number of items in your feed down. ...Limit the number of items to, say,
fifteen at most (this is the original limit on # items in an rss file). I suspect this is why my feed wouldn't load at Live.com
yesterday (I had about thirty items in the xml file).
If possible, keep the size of your feed down ...Not too many
bytes. If you have a very looong feed, you might also provide a
summary feed that loads quicker.
Specify an icon for your feed. ...They display it, so you may as
well include it.
Have a short, snappy name for your feed. ...Otherwise, they'll
truncate it, and not even provide an ellipsis. (Notice that 'Tales from the Sharpside'
became just 'Tales from the' and you have to mouseover this text to
see the full name in a tool tip)
Ensure your feed is valid use mark pilgrim's excellent validator
What I've worked out though is that at certain times of day (probably aligned with US 'start of work day') you're unlikely to get a great result from live.com. So be it. I still find it an interesting ajax app (y'know microsoft *invented* ajax). For some reason, writing gadgets is a very tempting thing to geek like me:
Microsoft Gadgets: It's like a cut-down version of the internet... inside a cut-down version of a browser.... hosted on the... um, internet... in a, y'know, browser.
I've really tried to resist bagging this big announcement from microsoft. but i've also made the mistake of trying to use live.com
Your online world gets better when everything works simply and effortlessly together.
Pity that the 'out of the box' experience (1) didn't work, (2) wasn't simple (3) wasn't effortless and (4) lacked 'togetherness'.
I clicked all the bits that looked clickable, watched as things changed. One box said: "You can see your Windows Live Mail or Hotmail inbox here if you sign in."
Hmmm. I was already signed in... my name was displayed in the top right, proof positive that my sign-in was successful. But no email showed up. Five minutes of digging showed me that what they meant to say was: "You can see your Windows Live Mail or Hotmail inbox here if you sign in *AND* you've joined the beta program, for which we send you to a page from which you have to hunt around before going to another page... and even then you'd better have hotmail because we don't accept anyone else."
But of course the real test of an aggregator is: Does it successfully aggregate secretGeek.net/rss.asp??... the answer a resounding NO!
The reason i use swear words (sorry about that., by the way... I went all blythopathic for a moment) is that they imply that my feed is bad. Not true (this time). This time, I'm pretty sure the mistake is on live.com's side. And there's no hint given about what's wrong. Damn them.
Anyway, I might like live.com if:
They let me use google as my search. (Instead i feel like they are trying to grab the web in a strangle hold)
My Yahoo The Web 1.0 way of doing integrated portals ;-)
Alfy The web portal for kids -- i don't know what this is, but I like it :-)
Kudos to the people who worked on this project though. They've definitely got some very talented people, and I hope that criticisms of live.com don't cause too much stress to the developers who've made it happen. I just find it interesting that even a multi-mega-billion dollar company can't get a launch to work seamlessly, even when the whole pitch is about working seamlessly.
Could someone please prepare some sort of injection device that can put all of this knowledge into my brain without hurting me too much. I am trying to use conventional reading materials, but the impedence mismatch is too great and my eyes are burning.
On the plus side this is one of the most fun things I've dealt with in years.